A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours around the development of a wall at a coastal website within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national attention following an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of planning breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions post about René Collier as well as the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved right into a very publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development is effective at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek to create their relatives house. The case has become emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, wherever enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded people. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being built by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each citizens of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their organizing permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, bringing about an encroachment on the Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, specifically within a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the proper place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to protect their see, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal preparing disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, according to sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments, an image that has given that turn into emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely observed that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated in detail because of the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant in the legal timeline.
In the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as built, goes over and above what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of arranging paperwork, maps, and conditions connected on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed Accountant Paul Feely that their action is motivated by issue for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting in its place that it is about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've described their prolonged-standing link to the region and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just trying to establish a household house in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one performs have been carried out based upon professional guidance and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Location of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another very long following the authorized costs have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of organic beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre with the dispute stands partially created, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.